Marks of the Fascist, Tacky, Insatiable Beast
As we approach the 100-day milestone (yes it's only been that long) a sadistic, repressive regime increasingly reviled by its own people defiantly hurtles on - arresting judges, crushing dissent, abducting migrants, citizens, pregnant mothers, sick toddlers - while grotesquely cashing in on its atrocities with tawdry meme coins, black-tie dinners, loyalty pins and OMFG 2028 hats. We are become government by chaos, cruelty, greed - Liberace backed by the Stasi, a nation of gulags filled with gold (plated) gimcracks. SAD.
Historically, the 100-day milestone is seen as an ad-hoc national Rorschach test on a new president - or in this case führer - with pundits viewing the political landscape and drawing data-based conclusions. Amidst today's mayhem, though, the only clear verdict is, "There's some seriously dystopian things going on." Polls show an administration (sic) that's lost the support of much of its populace - “He has broken his own record for being the worst" - with approval ratings underwater on virtually every issue, including the economy and immigration. Happily, he keeps losing in court, even with Trump-appointed judges: Thank you independent judiciary and the ACLU. Nobody wants to visit his third-world shithole of a country anymore, mouthy Democrats like Jasmine Crockett are saying mean things about him - to his rants about keeping us safe from criminals she invariably notes, "I haven’t seen anybody with a rap sheet that looks like the president’s” - and despite a lame "ONLY THE WEAK WILL FAIL!” rallying cry, he's crashed the economy with "this most imbecilic and destructive trade war in the history of the world."
The "holy-shit-that's-dumb" spectacle of his disastrous "Liberation Day" tariffs offered grim quick proof of his staggering ineptness: What could match the mad dissonance of $6 trillion instantly obliterated in a market meltdown as he bragged of "billions and billions of dollars pouring into our country"? He confused trade deficits with the national debt, made up numbers - a 25% tariff on cars would raise $100 billion, no wait, $600 billion - and wildly flip-flopped. It turns out he based his "formula" on research its author said he got "very wrong" and advice by a fictional "Ron Vara" conjured up by Peter Navarro, who Elon dubbed "dumb as a sack of bricks" before later apologizing to bricks. The crowning moment of "chickenfuckery": Nobody collected any money at ports packed with goods due to a "technical glitch." The Economist on the "complete drivel" of a trade policy by an idiot duped by his own MAGA echo chamber: "Ifyou failed to spot America being 'looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by nations near and far,' congratulations: You have a firmer grip on reality than the President of the United States."
Luckily for him, a flunky says, "He’s at the peak of just not giving a fuck anymore." Great news for the nuclear codes! Thus does the old mad king spend over a quarter of his time at his crappy golf courses - cue many Nero cartoons - at a cost of more than $3 million a game. Asked about his weekend as the economy burned, he gloated, "I won (at golf) - it's good to win." We wouldn't know. Meanwhile, he rants, spews, babbles, out of the loop. He's considering drone strikes on Mexican drug cartels. He wished "Happy Easter to all," even the "despicable and unAmerican radical left lunatics (who) hate our country so much" and the "WEAK and INEFFECTIVE judges allowing this sinister attack so violent it will never be forgotten!" On Earth Day, focusing on the important things and celebrating now that "we finally have a president who follows science," he announced he's putting up two, new, beautiful, "top of the line" flag poles at the White House: "They needed flag poles for 200 years. It was something I've often said, you know, they don't have a flag pole per se. It's going to be two beautiful poles." Encountering bad polls, he literally raves.
As always, it's also, "a great time to get rich." Which is why he's still stupefyingly - how much money is enough? - grifting, a tacky hucksterism that echoes a 2016 portrayal of Trump as the GOP's "answer to Liberace." Both bitchy, germaphobe divas, Trump was (sort of) friends with the king of glitz, a master of sequined suits, candelabras on his Cadillac and gold-and-chandelier-drenched home - akin to Trump Tower, "the Liberace of buildings" - but topped by a faux Sistine Chapel ceiling featuring himself. His mantra: ‘Too much of a good thing is wonderful." And so to Trump's new scam, a $TRUMP memecoin that netted him millions, joined by $MELANIA, before predictably crashing. Now he's offering “the most EXCLUSIVE INVITATION in the World," where top buyers can attend an "unforgettable Gala DINNER.” "Own $TRUMP! ARE YOU IN?” shrieks the promo with exploding confetti like Better Call Saul ads. "The competition is fierce!" Sen. Chris Murphy: "This is the most brazenly corrupt thing a President has ever done. Not close.” All told, it has been "100 days from Hell," "delusions of monarchy" mixed with "fundamental ineptitude."
Still, the scams and bling keep coming. Recently, FCC Chair Brendan Carr posted a photo of himself wearing a gold lapel pin of Dear Leader squinting up like he did at an eclipse, a cultish image prompting the NYT to boldly suggest it "raises questions" - like, given its resemblance to once-ubiquitous Mao Tse-Tung pins, "Is Trump the most communist leader we've ever had?" Following in the tradition of dictators past - Libyan students had to quote Gaddafi, Turkmenistan's gold statue rotated to the sun, North Koreans wear Kim Jong-un badges and sing Friendly Father - Trump has worn an aptly cartoonish version of himself, and myriad pins online go for as little as $3.97. His relentless merch machine hawks this for $25, "gold-plated," reportedly of a base metal used for cheap doodads that's toxic: "Tacky and cheap in every way. The Trump brand." Also, "The SS had their Death Head, MAGA has their Shit Head." The White House denies rumors pin-wearing is mandatory, but adds it's A-ok to "show support for the greatest President in history," also nice little family you have and how sad if anything happened to them.
More grandiose gestures hover. Trump is said to be considering planning a much-dreamed-of, $100-million "great celebratory military parade," just like other big bad guys, to mark his June 14 birthday, which coincides with the Army's 250th anniversary. Cue marching soldiers, armored vehicles, tanks ripping up the streets of D.C, and what waste and fraud? Also, the guy losing faster and sooner than any president in history continues trolling about maybe running (or crawling by then) for a third term. "They say I can't run again - that's the expression," he jabbered in February. "There are methods which you could do it. A lot of people want me to do it." Just in case, he's already cashing in with yet another crappy red cap - more trashy, deadly marks of the beast - this one declaring Trump 2028, which costs $50 and promises to "make a statement," presumably about evil tinpot wannabe dictators who just will not STFU. His store is also selling $36 t-shirts: "Trump 2028 (Rewrite the Rules). The future looks bright!" Except - per Billy Roach's "Facts owe" - for most of the denizens of a now-ravaged, on-the-edge America.
Back in the real world, away from the bling and lies and frenzied delusion, Trump and his accomplices are feverishly committing ever more outlandish atrocities against everyone who isn't them, especially if brown-skinned. Last month, citing "the dynamic nature of enforcement operations," the Justice Dept (sic) quietly gave ICE agents the power to conduct searches without warrants of people’s homes if based on "a reasonable belief" they suspect targets of being "an Alien Enemy." (Good god almighty they deserve hell just for their twisted desecration of language itself). "As much as practicable," agents should follow legal procedures and get warrants before "contacting an Alien Enemy,” the memo generously adds. “However, that will not always be realistic or effective in swiftly identifying and removing Alien Enemies," so sometimes they might just be whisked in the middle of the night into murderous gulags in foreign countries like Abrego Garcia and over 200 Venezuelans who happen to have tattoos while Kristi De Goebbels primps and smirks, but hey, too bad, so sad, at least now we're legally covered.
Under such dubious rubrics, Trump's rabid cabal of fascists and lickspittles have eagerly taken on the task of dismantling burdensome due process. Slimy Marco Rubio has defended detaining and seeking to deport over 300 innocents, including Tufts graduate student Rumesya Oztur, for mere political speech he doesn't agree with, gloating, "Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visa. It's just that simple." Except when not: In another shitshow, he also revoked visas for South Sudanese after their country allegedly refused to accept one of their own named Nimeri Garang; in fact, Rubio mistakenly sent them DRC citizen Makula Kintu who told the U.S. he wasn’t from South Sudan but they wouldn't listen, insisting his argument was "legally irrelevant." Defying multiple court orders, Rubio is reportedly still sending “alien enemy” victims to El Salvador if they're over 14 - "What about those deadly Venezuelan toddlers?" - and praising their evil, profit-making alliance as “an example for security and prosperity, though U.S. law bars financial support for “units of foreign security forces," torturous or no.
Meanwhile Nazi Press Barbie says they're "exploring legal pathways" to disappear U.S. citizens, but only "heinous criminals (who) have broken our laws repeatedly," maybe like with 33 felony convictions? Tulsi Gabbard says gangs are foreign terrorists "invading" us 'cause they're working with the Venezuelan government to make America weaker and browner so they don't deserve any due process, though experts and 17 of 18 U.S. intelligence agencies call the charge "ludicrous"; in response she told Congress they're all deep-state liars who "twisted and manipulated" the (fictional) evidence "to undermine the president's agenda," she "fully supports" the (imaginary) assessment they're foreign terrorists acting with Maduro's support, they're thus subject to arrest and removal as alien enemies, and in what one skeptic calls "the fastest mole hunt in the history of mole hunts," she's already referred the leaking "deep-state criminals" to the DOJ for possible prosecution and, obviously, conveniently, their removal to CECOT or some similarly merciless location. Whew. Stalin really could have used her.
And still the ICE rampage escalates. In New Orleans, they just arrested, held incommunicado and deported two mothers, one pregnant, and their three U.S.-citizen children - 7, 4 and a 2-year-old girl with metatastic cancer - at a routine immigration hearing, even as the girl's father was frantically petitioning the court to keep her in the country; agents admitted the move was a ploy to get him to turn himself in. For once, there was blowback: A horrified judge, Trump-appointed yet, ordered a hearing based on his
"strong suspicion the government just deported a U.S. citizen with no meaningful process.” We hope he knows multiple others have met the same fate - U.S. permanent residents detained at DHS offices, delivering paperwork, in naturalization interviews, a deported family with a 10-year-old U.S. citizen with brain cancer, a deported Cuban wife of a U.S. citizen with whom she shares a baby daughter. Her distraught husband: "They separated a girl from her mother. They killed a mother, a father, and the future of a girl while she was still alive." So much winning.
On Friday, the fascist-abuse-of-state-power-meter got turned up still more when FBI agents in Wisconsin arrested Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, 65, for allegedly helping an immigrant evade arrest by ICE in her courtroom by letting him leave by another door. Though they caught him later, an outraged Ka$h Patel clamored, "We believe Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away from the subject, an illegal alien" - oh how they love their racist slurs - for which she faces two federal felony counts of obstruction and concealing an individual. Defense attorneys called the action "very, very outrageous"; Attorney-General (sic) Pam Bondi, who took bribes to let both Jeffrey Epstein and Trump U. skate, went on Fox News as usual to declare the judiciary "deranged" and darkly warn, "We will find you." FactPac called on the Florida Bar to review Bondi's conduct and consider her disbarment for being "a lawless Attorney General." Finally, observers wondered, "What stage of fascism does arresting judges mark?" and speculated, "Her Nuremberg trial will be the best one."
Because the authoritarian goal is to harass or intimidate anyone who seems able to thwart their power, the regime's targets have also included labor unions, disgruntled or fired federal workers threatened with criminal penalties if they speak up - "Und Blabbermouths vill be zhot" - and victims of former anti-discrimination agencies like Equal Employment perversely flipped in service of today's hatred, like Barnard College professors asked to declare if they're Jewish and have encountered anti-Semitism or "unwelcome discussions." Given the sinister Red-Scare tactics and horrific damage inflicted by "a guy who eats a big bowl of contempt for breakfast each morning," it's hard to fathom the freakish juxtapositions at work, to conflate the cheesy clown and huckster with the foul, dark, implacably broken sociopath, devoid of empathy, grace, any saving human virtue. Jamelle Bouie posits a personality so driven by the need to dominate, to demonstrate "mastery over his perceived enemies," to "trample over those who don’t belong in his America," that he "will always want more...There must be a loser or else there is no Trump." (Please).
"When historians reflect on this regime," Robert Reich muses, "cruelty will be the word most used to define it." Also emblematic, others suggest: Sadism, stupidity, corruption, the vital task of "seeing people for who they really are." Recently, comedian Larry David wrote a blistering piece parodying Bill Maher's account of a dinner with Trump, who he called "gracious and measured." David's My Dinner With Adolf begins when, in the spring of 1939, a letter arrives "inviting me to dinner (with) the world’s most reviled man, Adolf Hitler.” "Everyone said don't go, he's a monster," but he decides "we need to talk to the other side - even if it (has) annexed other countries and committed unspeakable crimes against humanity." At dinner, Hitler laughs and tells jokes, like about his dog having diarrhea; he beams, "'Hey, if I can kill Jews, Gypsies and homosexuals, I can kill a dog!' which got the biggest laugh of the night...Suddenly he seemed so human. Like this was the real Hitler...We're not all that different." Leaving, he tells the furher, "I'm so thankful i came. Although we disagree on many issues, it doesn’t mean we have to hate each other." Then, "I gave him a Nazi salute and walked out into the night.”
Fossil Fuels Blamed as 84% of World's Coral Reefs Hit by Worst Bleaching Event Ever Recorded
A year after scientists warned the world was seeing its fourth mass coral bleaching event, rising ocean temperatures fueled by greenhouse gas emissions have now devastated 84% of Earth's coral reefs—with likely knock-on effects for about a third of all marine species and 1 billion people whose lives and livelihoods are directly impacted by the health of the "rainforests of the sea."
Coral Reef Watch at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) released its latest data on Wednesday, showing the current bleaching event has become the most widespread on record, impacting reefs from the Indian Ocean to the Atlantic and Pacific.
The news comes three months after scientists confirmed 2024 was the hottest year on record. Last year, meteorologists also found that sea surface temperatures in the North Atlantic were about 2°F higher than the 1990-2020 average and nearly 3°F above the average in the 1980s.
Unusually warm ocean waters cause corals to expel algae that give the reefs their bright color and deliver nutrients, supporting the immense biodiversity that is normally found within the reefs. Prolonged bleaching can kill coral reefs.
"The magnitude and extent of the heat stress is shocking," marine scientist Melanie McField, the founder of the Healthy Reefs for Healthy People initiative in the Caribbean, told Reuters. "Some reefs that had thus far escaped major heat stress and we thought to be somewhat resilient, succumbed to partial mortalities in 2024."
Derek Manzello, director of Coral Reef Watch, told The Guardian that some reefs that had been considered safe from the impact of rising ocean temperatures have now been bleached.
"Some reefs that had thus far escaped major heat stress and we thought to be somewhat resilient, succumbed to partial mortalities in 2024."
“The fact that so many reef areas have been impacted," he said, "suggests that ocean warming has reached a level where there is no longer any safe harbor from coral bleaching and its ramifications."
The current coral bleaching event began in January 2023. That same year, scientists were alarmed by an ocean heatwave off the coast of Florida that rapidly bleached the continental United States' only living barrier reef.
That event prompted NOAA to introduce a new coral bleaching alert scale from Level 1—significant bleaching—to Level 5, at which point a reef is approaching mortality.
Another ocean heatwave last year threatened Australia's Great Barrier Reef, eight years after nearly half of the coral in some northern parts of the 1,400-mile reef was killed by a mass bleaching event.
But recent major bleaching events affecting specific reefs have not compared to the current widespread devastation in the world's oceans.
“Reefs have not encountered this before," said Britta Schaffelke, coordinator of the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, told The Guardian. "With the ongoing bleaching it's almost overwhelming the capacity of people to do the monitoring they need to do. The fact that this most recent, global-scale coral bleaching event is still ongoing takes the world's reefs into uncharted waters."
The other three mass bleaching events on record occurred from 2014-17, with 68% of the world's reefs affected; in 2010, when 37% were impacted; and in 1998, when 21% suffered bleaching.
The report from Coral Reef Watch followed the Trump administration's under-the-radar release of climate change data that minimized NOAA's findings about the level of planet-heating carbon dioxide emissions in the atmosphere. President Donald Trump also issued an executive order demanding sunset provisions for every existing energy regulation and notified companies that they can seek exemptions to clean air regulations.
Joerg Wiedenmann, a marine biologist at the Coral Reef Laboratory at the University of Southampton in England, emphasized that taking action to stop the heating of the world's oceans could protect coral reefs, the marine species they provide habitats to, and the communities they support by protecting coastlines and providing fishing and tourism jobs.
"If we manage to decrease ocean warming," Wiedenmann toldThe Washington Post, "there is always a chance for corals to recover."
'Time to Break Up This Tech Giant,' Says Warren After Latest Monopoly Ruling Against Google
For the second time in less than a year, a federal judge on Thursday ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly in part of its tech business—leading to the latest calls for the Silicon Valley giant to be broken up to end its anticompetitive practices.
U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that Google holds a monopoly over two online advertising markets, after the U.S. Justice Department and several states filed a lawsuit arguing its practices allowing it to dominate advertising technology had enabled the $1.88 trillion company to charge higher prices and take a bigger portion of profits from sales.
"In addition to depriving rivals of the ability to compete, this exclusionary conduct substantially harmed Google's publisher customers, the competitive process, and, ultimately, consumers of information on the open web," said Brinkema in the 115-page decision.
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) applauded DOJ lawyers and called the victory "the result of years of work to rein in tech companies' abuses."
Google's latest legal defeat, said the senator, shows that "Google is an illegal monopolist—and it's time to break up this tech giant."
Jonathan Kanter, former assistant attorney general in the DOJ's Antitrust Division, added that the company "is an illegal monopolist twice over."
"The company's near-total dominance of the online advertising market hurts media companies, rival search engines, social media companies, and anyone who consumes media on the internet."
Last August, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta issued a landmark ruling in another antitrust case against Google, saying the company had illegally monopolized the online search and general text advertising markets.
Next week, Mehta is scheduled to consider whether to break up the company over its control of online searches. The DOJ has also called for a breakup of Google's advertising tech monopoly.
"Case by case, antitrust enforcers are taming the beasts of Big Tech," said Lee Hepner, senior legal counsel at the American Economic Liberties Project. "Yet another monumental win in the history of antitrust enforcement, this case in particular is a win for journalists, publishers, online content creators, and the distributed open web."
In the advertising tech case that was decided Thursday, the government argued last year that Google locked web publishers into using its software, harming websites that produce content that they make available for free online.
The result of Google's practices, said Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, "is that our internet is less open and free, and civic discourse has irreparably been damaged by killing the local news we need to operate a vibrant democracy."
"This ruling is an unequivocal win for the American people that will help lower prices, increase competition, and lead to a better internet for everyone," said Haworth.
Jason Kint, CEO of the nonprofit trade association Digital Content Next, said Thursday's ruling underscores "the global harm caused by Google's practices, which have deprived premium publishers worldwide of critical revenue, undermining their ability to sustain high-quality journalism and entertainment."
"Today's decision," said Kint, "is a significant step toward restoring competition and accountability in the digital advertising ecosystem."
Emily Peterson-Cassin, corporate power director at Demand Progress Education Fund, said that "Google's illegal monopolies are blunting [the United States'] competitive edge in the tech industry" and called on the courts to take far-reaching action against the company.
"Our nation has grown prosperous and powerful because of competition," said Peterson-Cassin. "The company's near-total dominance of the online advertising market hurts media companies, rival search engines, social media companies, and anyone who consumes media on the internet. As one of the richest, most powerful companies in the history of humanity, a mere fine or slap on the wrist won't cut it. For the good of our nation and the health of our tech and media industries the government must force Google to sell its advertising technology division."
On May Day, UAW Members Launch Strike at Weapons Giant Lockheed Martin
As an estimated tens of thousands mobilized for actions planned to honor May Day, also known as International Workers' Day, the United Auto Workers announced Thursday that over 900 UAW members who work for Lockheed Martin, the world's largest defense company, have gone on strike.
Those striking include members of UAW Local 788 in Orlando and Local 766 in Denver, according to the union, which alleges that the company has committed "multiple unfair labor practices and refused to present a fair economic proposal that meets the membership's needs."
The two locals are covered by the same bargaining agreement, according toThe Denver Post, and workers in both locations walked off the job after voting down an offer from Lockheed Martin on Saturday. The company has "refused to present a fair economic proposal that meets the membership's needs," per the union.
The outlet Orlando Weeklyreported that the union says Lockheed Martin has offered "meaningful" pay raises for union members during contract discussions, but other issues have remained unresolved. They include holiday schedules, cost of living allowance, healthcare and prescription drug coverage, among others, according to UAW.
"It would be nice for the future generations and everybody else coming in not to have to wait 18 years to provide for their family like I have," Michael Mahoney, who has worked at Lockheed Martin for 21 years and and is a military veteran, told Orlando Weekly.
"They say they support the military, they want to use the veteran status, but when it comes to really showing us—a veteran, you know—the appreciation that we deserve, it don't feel like we get appreciated at all around here," said Mahoney.
The defense giant brought in $5.3 billion in net earnings in 2024, and has secured $1.7 billion in profits in the first quarter of 2025.
Union workers rallied outside of the Lockheed Martin Waterton Campus in Denver on Thursday, according to the local outlet 9NEWS."Lockheed's workers have to wait years and even decades before seeing a comfortable standard of living, while its executives are swimming in taxpayer dollars," said UAW Region 4 director Brandon Campbell in a statement on Thursday. "Lockheed is a textbook example of corporate greed and I'm proud to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with our members as they fight for their fair share."
According to 9NEWS, Lockheed Martin issued the following statement regarding the strike: "We value our employees and their expertise and look forward to reaching a fair labor agreement for both sides. Our employees perform important work for our customers and the nation through their work supporting programs critical to our national security."
US Postal Service Now Aiding Trump's Mass Deportation Effort
The United States Postal Service has joined the ranks of federal agencies that are cooperating with President Donald Trump's mass deportation operation that's sent hundreds of people to a foreign prison without due process and deported more than one young U.S. citizen with cancer.
As The Washington Postreported Tuesday, leaders of the Postal Inspection Service—the USPS law enforcement arm that's more accustomed to investigating threats against mail carriers and contraband sent through the mail—agreed to participate in Trump's deportation campaign amid threats from the administration that it could take control of USPS.
Administration officials moved to oust Postmaster General Louis DeJoy last month, and Trump has discussed the idea of privatizing the agency and bringing it under the control of the Department of Commerce.
"We want to play well in the sandbox," an email from the inspection service said after a meeting with immigration officials, according to the Post.
So far, that has included postal inspectors' participation in an immigration raid in Colorado Springs on Sunday, according to a video posted on social media by the local Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) office, which also showed at least one official from the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) criminal investigation unit. More than 100 undocumented immigrants were arrested in the raid.
"Is there a single government agency or service left that hasn't fully embraced fascism?" asked one critic on Bluesky.
Trump signed an executive order shortly after taking office directing all federal law enforcement agencies to take part in locating and deporting undocumented immigrants. Earlier this month, immigrant rights and privacy advocates were outraged at the news that the IRS would begin cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by allowing it to access taxpayer data.
In the case of the USPS law enforcement arm, immigration officials are working with postal inspectors to access photographs of the outside of envelopes and packages and the postal agency's surveillance systems, including credit card data and mail tracking information, to help locate undocumented immigrants.
Postal inspectors have previously taken part in federal law enforcement operations, but this marks the first time they have been involved in immigration enforcement.
One source who remained anonymous for fear of retribution told the Post that the Postal Inspection Service is "very, very nervous" about its new involvement, but leaders "seem to be trying to placate Trump by getting involved with things they think he'd like."
"But it's complete overreach," they said. "This is the Postal Service. Why are they involved in deporting people?"
Jonathan Cohn of the grassroots group Progressive Mass said the new development at USPS is indicative of the Trump administration "weaponizing every arm of the federal government to commit state terror against the population."
Palestinian Envoy to ICJ: Israel Using Starvation as 'Weapon of War' in 'Genocidal Campaign'
With Israel's "total and complete blockade" leaving people across Gaza "slowly dying" if they aren't being "killed with bombs and bullets," according to one United Nations official, Palestinian envoy Ammar Hijazi was among those who described the reality on the ground to the U.N.'s top court on Monday as the body considered Israel's legal obligations in Palestine.
Ammar Hijazi, Palestinian ambassador to the Netherlands, warned the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that since October 2023, Israel's blockade on humanitarian aid "has progressively turned into a total siege."
"Israel is starving, killing, and displacing Palestinians, while also targeting and blocking humanitarian organizations trying to save their lives," he said, accusing the Israeli military of waging a "genocidal campaign" in Gaza.
On March 2, for the second time since the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) began bombarding Gaza in retaliation for a Hamas-led attack in October 2023, Israel halted all humanitarian aid into the enclave. The total blockade was followed by Israel's decision to end a cease-fire that has begun in January, conducting a bombing campaign that killed hundreds of Palestinians in its first day.
For nearly two months, food supplies have dwindled in Gaza, and the World Food Program announced last week that it had delivered its last remaining stocks of hot meals to food kitchens.
The siege has created conditions that are "incompatible with sustaining life or the continued existence of Palestinians in Gaza," Hijazi said.
The ambassador noted that the ICJ hearing was taking place to consider whether Israel is violating international law.
"It is not about the number of aid trucks Israel is or is not allowing into the Occupied Palestinian Territories, especially Gaza," said Hijazi. "It is about Israel destroying the fundamentals of life in Palestine while it blocks U.N. and other humanitarians from providing lifesaving aid to the population. It is about Israel unraveling fundamental principles of international law, including their obligations under the U.N. Charter."
"Starvation is here," Hijazi added. "Humanitarian aid is being used as a weapon of war."
The hearing on Monday was the first of several that will take place at the ICJ over the next five days, following a resolution passed by the U.N. General Assembly last year calling on the court to consider Israel's legal responsibilities after the government blocked the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) from operating in the Palestinian territories—cutting Palestinians off from the agency that has for years provided crucial food aid, cash assistance, and health services, among other necessities.
Elinor Hammarskjold, U.N. undersecretary-general for legal affairs, argued during the hearing that Israel's ban on UNRWA is "inconsistent with Israel's obligation under international law" and warned that Israel has an "overarching obligation to administer the territory for the benefit of the local population" and must "agree to and facilitate relief schemes."
As the hearing was underway, medical sources in Gaza toldAl Jazeera that at least 36 people had been killed in Israeli attacks since dawn while eight out of 12 ambulances in southern Gaza were no longer operating due to a lack of fuel.
The Palestinian Civil Defense said its capacity to respond to residents in need will be increasingly reduced by the blockade, "threatening the lives of hundreds of thousands of citizens and displaced persons in shelters."
"We hold the Israeli occupation responsible for the worsening suffering of our people in the Gaza Strip due to the ongoing war and the continued imposition of the blockade," said the civil defense.
In addition to describing to the court the impact of Israel's blockade, Hijazi spoke about the IDF's attacks that have killed hundreds of aid workers, including nearly 300 UNRWA staff members and dozens of paramedics.
"These killings are deliberate, not accidental," he said of the killing earlier this month of 15 paramedics who were found with bullet wounds in a mass grave, and whose vehicles were shown to be clearly marked in cellphone footage that was later released—despite Israeli claims that they had provoked suspicion by driving in the dark without headlights on.
One of the attorneys representing Palestine at the ICJ, Paul Reichler, said that "the inhumanity of this Israeli policy is compounded by its unlawful objective: to forever extinguish the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination."
"In these circumstances, there can be no doubt that Israel is violating its obligations under international humanitarian law, including obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention and customary international law," said Reichler.
Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh, another of the international human rights lawyers who represented Palestine at the ICJ on Monday, cataloged just some of Israel's recent displays of hostility to the rule of law, noting that Defense Minister Israel Katz said earlier this month that "Israel's policy is clear: No humanitarian aid will enter Gaza," and that the Israeli government is planning to annex 75 square kilometers of the southern Gaza city of Rafah as part of a so-called "buffer zone."
Ní Ghrálaigh emphasized that "despite the extraordinary efforts of Palestinian journalists, who are themselves repeatedly targeted and killed, so much remains undocumented."
"As stated by UNRWA's commissioner-general, I quote, 'I shudder to think of what will still be revealed about the horrors that have taken place in this narrow strip of land,'" she said.
Forty states and four international groups are scheduled to present in the upcoming ICJ hearings, which are separate from the genocide case filed at the court by South Africa. The ICJ said in January 2024 that Israel was required to take steps to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide and to provide humanitarian aid.
A ruling in the case that began Monday is expected to take several months to be announced.
Reporters Without Borders Sounds Alarm Over Trump Effort to 'Bring the Press Into Line'
RSF says Trump's moves "have jeopardized the country's news outlets and indicate that he intends to follow through on his threats, setting up a potential crisis for American journalism."
Press freedom in the United States has fallen to its lowest level since Reporters Without Borders began publishing its annual ranking more than 20 years ago, with President Donald Trump's return to power "greatly exacerbating the situation," RSF said Friday.
The U.S. fell from 55th to 57th place on RSF's World Press Freedom Index, marking the second straight year that the situation in the country which lists freedom of the press first in its Bill of Rights has been classified as "problematic." The report comes ahead of World Press Freedom Day on May 3.
The U.S. has been trending downward on RSF's index since 2013, when it ranked 32nd in global press freedom. A decade later, it had fallen to 45th place before plunging to 55th place last year amid Trump's attacks on the media.
"Trump was elected to a second term after a campaign in which he denigrated the press on a daily basis and made explicit threats to weaponize the federal government against the media," the report states.
Press freedom in the United States has hit a record low, according to the latest World Press Freedom Index published annually by Reporters Without Borders.
[image or embed]
— Axios (@axios.com) May 1, 2025 at 9:03 PM
"His early moves in his second mandate to politicize the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), banThe Associated Press from the White House, or dismantle the U.S. Agency for Global Media, for example, have jeopardized the country's news outlets and indicate that he intends to follow through on his threats, setting up a potential crisis for American journalism," the publication continues, accusing Trump of using "false economic pretexts" to "bring the press into line."
"The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides broad protections for the press. However, no meaningful press freedom legislation has been passed at the national level in recent years despite the country's consistent slide on the Press Freedom Index," the report notes. "The PRESS Act, a federal shield law, failed to pass for a second successive time in 2024. More than a dozen states and communities have proposed or enacted laws to limit journalists' access to public spaces, including barring them from legislative meetings and preventing them from recording the police."
RSF continued:
Economic constraints have a considerable impact on journalists. Roughly one-third of the American newspapers operating in 2005 have now shuttered. While some public media outlets, and radio stations in particular, have been able to offset this decline thanks to online subscription models, others have found ways to sustain growth through individual donations. Massive waves of layoffs swept the U.S. media throughout 2023 and 2024 and have continued into 2025, affecting both local newsrooms and major legacy outlets. Many parts of the country are now considered news deserts, with the disappearance of local news outlets reaching crisis levels. Since 2022, more than 8,000 journalists have been laid off in the U.S.
Furthermore, "more Americans have no trust in the media than trust it a fair amount. Online harassment, particularly towards women and minorities, is also a serious issue for journalists and can impact their quality of life and safety."
"Politicians' open disdain for the media has trickled down to the public," RSF added. "Journalists reporting on the ground can face harassment, intimidation, and assault while working. When covering demonstrations, journalists are sometimes attacked and physically assaulted by protestors or wrongfully arrested by police. According to the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, there were 49 journalist arrests in 2024 compared to only 15 in 2023. The last journalist to be killed in the course of his work was Dylan Lyons in February of 2023."
RSF paints a grim picture for journalism around the world.
"The conditions for practicing journalism are bad in half of the world's countries," as "less than 1% of the world's population lives in a country where press freedom is fully guaranteed," the report states.
Noting that economic self-sufficiency is critical to a free press, RSF editorial director Anne Bocandé said in a statement that "guaranteeing freedom, independence,s and plurality in today's media landscape requires stable and transparent financial conditions."
"Without economic independence, there can be no free press," Bocandé continued. "When news media are financially strained, they are drawn into a race to attract audiences at the expense of quality reporting, and can fall prey to the oligarchs and public authorities who seek to exploit them. When journalists are impoverished, they no longer have the means to resist the enemies of the press—those who champion disinformation and propaganda."
"The media economy must urgently be restored to a state that is conducive to journalism and ensures the production of reliable information, which is inherently costly," she added. "Solutions exist and must be deployed on a large scale. The media's financial independence is a necessary condition for ensuring free, trustworthy information that serves the public interest."
RSF's new rankings come days after U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi ended a Biden administration policy that strictly limited the Justice Department's authority to seize journalists' records and compel them to testify in leak investigations.
On Wednesday, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) published a report on Trump's first 100 days in office, which the group said were "marked by a flurry of executive actions that have created a chilling effect and have the potential to curtail media freedoms."
"It is disturbing that, on the eve of #WorldPressFreedomDay, the Trump administration has dealt major blows to journalists and the public they serve." — Katherine Jacobsen, CPJ's U.S., Canada, and Caribbean program coordinator
[image or embed]
— Committee to Protect Journalists (@pressfreedom.bsky.social) May 2, 2025 at 9:09 AM
"From denying access to upending respect for the independence of a free press to vilifying news organizations to threatening reprisals, this administration has begun to exert its power to punish or reward based on coverage," CPJ said. "Whether in the states or on the streets, this behavior is setting a new standard for how the public can treat journalists."
"The uncertainty and fear resulting from these actions have caused requests for safety advice to increase as journalists and newsrooms aim to prepare for what might be next," the group added. "These moves represent a notable escalation from the first Trump administration, which also pursued banning and deriding elements of the press. After nearly a decade of repeating insults and falsehoods, and filing lawsuits, Trump has normalized disdain for media to an alarming degree."
'Genocide in Action' as 60-Day Blockade Plunges Gaza Into Mass Starvation
The two-month-long siege is a "clear and calculated effort to collectively punish over two million civilians and to make Gaza unlivable."
"This is genocide in action," said one official with Amnesty International on Friday, referring to Israel's two-month humanitarian blockade in Gaza which has resulted in death, starvation, and suffering on a nearly unimaginable scale.
The human rights group is demanding that Israel's allies, including the United States, take immediate action to ensure the Israeli government lifts the total aid blockade that's plunged the enclave into what the United Nations has called "mass starvation," with food supplies rapidly dwindling and thousands of children diagnosed with acute malnutrition.
"The international community must not continue to stand by as Israel perpetrates these atrocities with impunity," said Erika Guevara Rosas, Amnesty's senior director for research, advocacy, policy, and campaigns.
After a brief cease-fire, Israel reimposed a ban on the entry of commercial goods and aid into Gaza on March 2 and cut off power to the enclave's desalination plant, after it had been briefly reconnected to electricity. The plant's blackout has worsened water scarcity that's plagued Gaza for all of Israel's 17-year blockade and has left some Palestinians resorting to drinking seawater.
A spokesperson for the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) told reporters in Geneva on Friday that the agency is in "constant contact" with Israeli authorities as it advocates for the reopening of border crossings.
"We don't ask if food is nutritious or not, if it's fresh or good; that' a luxury, we just want to fill the stomachs of our children. I don't want my child to die hungry."
"Food stocks have now mainly run out, water access has become impossible," Olga Cherevko said, leaving children "who have been deprived of their childhood for many months... rummaging through piles of trash" in search of food and combustible material to burn for cooking, due to rapidly shrinking supplies of fuel.
"Gaza is inching closer to running on empty," said Cherevko.
Amnesty interviewed 35 internally displaced people about the forced starvation crisis facing Gaza, which began again shortly before Israel resumed its bombardment of the enclave on March 18—killing at least 2,325 people including 820 children since then.
With the severe food scarcity being "exploited by individuals hoarding or looting supplies, selling them at extortionate prices," according to Amnesty, most Palestinians are relying on overcrowded charity kitchens where they can wait for hours each day for just one meal.
"We don't ask if food is nutritious or not, if it's fresh or good; that' a luxury, we just want to fill the stomachs of our children. I don't want my child to die hungry," one parent told the aid group.
Another described sending their son to wait in line for drinking water "for hours and he had to walk long distances."
"With the relentless bombardment and danger lurking everywhere, you don't know," said the parent. "You may send your child to bring water only for him to return in a body bag. Every day is like this here."
OCHA has reported that 92% of infants and pregnant and breastfeeding mothers are not meeting their nutrient requirements, while the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) released a statement Friday warning that malnutrition among children is on the rise across the enclave.
"More than 9,000 children have been admitted for treatment of acute malnutrition since the beginning of the year," said Catherine Russell, executive director UNICEF. "Hundreds more children in desperate need of treatment are not able to access it due to the insecurity and displacement."
"For two months, children in the Gaza Strip have faced relentless bombardments while being deprived of essential goods, services and lifesaving care. With each passing day of the aid blockade, they face the growing risk of starvation, illness, and death—nothing can justify this," Russell added.
One doctor at Al-Rantissi pediatric hospital in Gaza City told Amnesty that healthcare workers have observed "the impact of the hunger on the children who come here to receive treatment... You recommend that the parent give the child specific attention, specific food, and you know that what you are recommending is an impossibility."
The two-month mark of the current siege came as the International Court of Justice held public hearings this week on Israel's humanitarian obligations in Gaza. The ICJ has previously ordered Israel to prevent genocide in Gaza and to allow humanitarian aid into the enclave.
Amnesty argued that the "cruel and inhumane siege" offers "further evidence of Israel's genocidal intent in Gaza."
"Apart from a brief respite during the temporary truce, Israel has relentlessly and mercilessly turned Gaza into an inferno of death and destruction," Erika Guevara Rosas said. "For the past two months, Israel has completely cut off the supply of humanitarian aid and other items indispensable to the survival of civilians in a clear and calculated effort to collectively punish over two million civilians and to make Gaza unlivable."
Mohamad Safa, CEO and representative to the U.N. for the non-governmental organization Patriotic Vision, emphasized that the crisis that is gripping Gaza is "not famine," but rather "forced starvation."
""Forced starvation is an act of genocide," he said.
U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), the only Palestinian-American member of Congress, repeated her call for an arms embargo on Israel, which counts the U.S. as the largest international funder of its military.
"The government of Israel is starving Gaza to death," said Tlaib. "It's a war crime to use starvation as a weapon. The only way to end this genocide is with an arms embargo. Time for my colleagues to end their silence."
Guevara Rosas accused the international community, especially Israel's allies, of "contemptible failure to live up to their legal responsibilities to prevent and bring an end to Israel's genocide in Gaza."
"These states' decades of inaction helped establish pervasive impunity for Israel's persistent violations and it is now exacting an unprecedented toll of death, destruction, and suffering on Palestinians," said Guevara Rosas. "States must take action to render Israel's violations against Palestinians politically, diplomatically, and economically unsustainable—the siege on Gaza must end now."
'No Legal Basis,' Says Harvard After Trump Declares Tax-Exempt Status Will Be Taken Away
"Such an unprecedented action would endanger our ability to carry out our educational mission," said a spokesperson for the Ivy League school.
Harvard University pushed back forcefully Friday after President Donald Trump declared in a social media post that "we are going to be taking away Harvard Tax Exempt Status," adding that is "what they deserve."
Trump's comment came just hours after Democratic senators sent a letter demanding a probe into whether the administration is acting illegally by trying to compel the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to yank the university's tax exemption.
Trump's post did not specify whether the IRS, the entity that has the power to remove an organization's tax-exempt status, is opting to remove Harvard's designation. Multiple outlets noted they got no immediate response from the IRS when they asked the agency for comment.
"There is no legal basis to rescind Harvard's tax-exempt status," a university spokesperson said in a statement, according toPolitico. "Such an unprecedented action would endanger our ability to carry out our educational mission."
It is illegal for the president, vice president, or other top officials to request, indirectly or directly, that the IRS audit a particular taxpayer.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and multiple other Democratic senators on Friday asked the Acting Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) to probe whether the IRS has received illegal pressure from the administration when it comes to Harvard, and to provide information about whether the agency is looking into other entities at the direction of the president or other top officials.
"It is both illegal and unconstitutional for the IRS to take direction from the president to target schools, hospitals, churches, or any other tax-exempt entities as retribution for using their free speech rights," the senators wrote in a letter dated Friday to the Acting TIGTA Heather Hill.
"It is further unconscionable that the IRS would become a weapon of the Trump administration to extort its perceived enemies, but the actions of the president and his operatives have now made this fear a reality. We request that you review whether the president or his allies have taken any step to direct or pressure the IRS to take politically-motivated actions regarding the tax-exempt status of the president's political targets," they continued.
Loss of tax-exempt status, something that would only typically occur after an audit process that allows the university opportunity to defend itself and appeal, would be extremely significant for the university. Tax-exempt status means the school does not pay federal income tax on charitable contributions to the school and other income. It also means that donations to the school are tax-exempt for those who make them.
Trump mused publicly on April 16 that Harvard should lose its tax-exempt status, after the university's president said the institution would not comply with a list of policy demands from the president, that included, according to the Harvard Crimson, derecognizing pro-Palestine student groups and auditing academic programs for viewpoint diversity. The pushback from Harvard prompted the administration to freeze over $2 billion in federal funding for the school.
That same week, it was reported that the IRS was making plans to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status.
In response to Trump's bullying tactics, Harvard sued the administration, calling the freeze on funding unlawful and asking the court to restore it.
The tangling between Harvard and the Trump administration is part of a broader wave of scrutiny by the White House on higher education.